trustly ecospend
Banks Middle East & Africa Trending

Saudi Banks Show Resilience Despite Expected Deterioration in Their Asset Quality and Profitability

S&P Global Ratings expect that the financial performance of rated Saudi banks will remain under pressure 2021 on the back of lower interest rates and higher cost of risk. As regulatory forbearance measures are gradually phased out and the economy adjusts to the new normal, the cost of risk will remain elevated in 2021, increasing to 140 bps (from 80 bps in 2019), before starting to gradually normalise in 2022.

Compared with other emerging markets, Saudi banks have shown some resilience thanks to support from the Central Bank and minimal reliance on external funding. Banks as vulnerable to a spike in geopolitical risk.

In the recent report “Banks In Emerging Markets: 15 Countries, Three Main Risks (January 2021 Update), S&P analysts expect that banking systems in emerging markets (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand, and Turkey) will face three common risks in 2021: The expected deterioration in asset quality indicators as regulatory forbearance measures are lifted; a volatile geopolitical environment or domestic policy uncertainty; and–for a few–vulnerability to abrupt movements in capital flows.

However, given the exceptionally low-interest rates in several developed markets, analysts expect Saudi banks with sound credit fundamentals to retain good access to international capital markets.

On the geopolitical side, with the incoming US administration, the potential reinstatement of the Iran nuclear deal could upset Saudi Arabia, some other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, and Israel. It is unclear how these governments will tackle the related challenges. In the GCC, 2021 started positively with the resolution of the boycott of Qatar by four Arab countries. S&P believe this will improve political and economic cooperation across the GCC. That said, the damage done by the three-year boycott of Qatar to the GCC’s political cohesiveness, both real and perceived, is likely to remain. If geopolitical risks heightened, investors could shift their attention to more stable regions. This would prompt an increase in funding costs, a lower appetite for regional instruments, or major foreign funding outflows. The transmission channels to other EMs include through commodity prices (mainly oil), which are likely to increase in case of conflict and depending on its severity, or through a shift in investor sentiment.

Overall, it is expected that banks will maintain high levels of core deposits in their funding base and their strong liquidity metrics will remain intact. It is also thought that the regulation will remain at least comparable with peer countries globally.


  • Polly is a journalist, content creator and general opinion holder from North Wales. She has written for a number of publications, usually hovering around the topics of fintech, tech, lifestyle and body positivity.

Related posts

Local or International, Consumers Prefer Companies Using Recognisable Payment Methods Finds PayU

Francis Bignell

Half of Brits Incorrectly Believe They’re Protected by Their Bank from Authorised Transfer Fraud

Manisha Patel

Kueski Launches In-Store Mobile Payments to Support Underserved Banking Customers in Mexico

The Fintech Times