tink cross-border payment crypto
Paytech Trending

payabl. Breaks Down the Pros and Cons of Payment Orchestration

A recent research by paytech company payabl. has looked into whether or not payment orchestration could become a key capability for merchants across varying sectors, and for businesses of all shapes and sizes.

The firm’s research has uncovered that while there are beneficial aspects of the technology that could see the landscape of payments and transactions positively changed, there are also a number of potential challenges and risks it could pose to merchants.

Payment orchestration is a technology-driven approach to solving payment complexity. It essentially involves using digital platforms – such as POLs (or Payment Orchestration Layers) and smart AI to connect merchants to several payment solution providers through a single, more efficient integration.

These systems can also automatically decide the best way to route a payment from checkout through to bank settlement. It increases the payment conversion and streamlines the payment journey. In theory, this gets through more transactions and therefore makes more money for merchants.

Time savings

Alongside the streamlined processes and faster transactions, another potential benefit for merchants includes subsequent time savings.

For international transactions, payment orchestration is said to even have the potential to simplify complex global payment processes. This is because a merchant only needs to interact with a single tool that would then allow them to manage the flow of payments through the necessary acquirers, PSPs and networks to facilitate rapid, secure transactions.

How a merchant’s data is organised by payment orchestration was another notable benefit the technology could theoretically bring to users. Isavella Frangou, VP sales and marketing, went on to explain how and why this was the case:

“POLs, using AI enable the optimisation of transaction routing – something we call ‘smart routing’. In addition, POLs can aggregate the data from the multiple payment providers, and so merchants can benefit from less fragmented, more unified reporting – since this enables better payment data analysis that aids in payment strategy formulation.

“Merchants with limited resources for all necessary integrations with multiple providers turn to POL’s to speed up implementation times.”

Not a simple road ahead

However, payabl.’s research into payment orchestration also recognised a number of issues that could be encountered through using these technologies that need to be carefully considered.

Frangou said: “Although orchestration does offer easy access to a multiple solutions, the intelligence behind the layer, really needs the expertise of the merchant themselves and that ‘human element’.

“On its own, the technology can’t really be clever enough to predict the routing and rules for the transactions based on the individual needs of each merchant and this is where partnering with a payment provider like payabl. can really help avoid some of the challenges that may arise .”

In addition, the POL a merchant uses must be able to onboard the necessary providers–the solution is pointless if the technology can’t support all the providers a merchant needs to connect to.

Losing control of the customer journey

There are also questions raised about to what extent providers will want to lose control of the customer journey by integrating with POLs. This loss of control and visibility may mean that a merchant will miss key changes in their customer behaviours and may lead to a loss of sales. Solving this issue, to facilitate multiple payment formats, front-end interfaces and accounts would also be a significant technical challenge for payment orchestration platforms.

From a regulatory perspective, payabl. understands that EU’s PSD2 and SCA (strong customer authentication) rules require payments to meet certain authentication criteria from the end customer. This may happen at multiple points along a purchasing journey, which would then force the customer to complete multiple checks, negating the benefit of a fast user experience.

“Although orchestration does offer easy access to a multiple solutions, the intelligence behind the layer, really needs the expertise of the merchant themselves and that ‘human element’.”

Lastly, while working with multiple providers can be inefficient, it is something that lowers risk levels. Whereas, a merchant moving to a single provider for their connection to multiple payment solutions basically puts all their eggs in a single basket. If that merchant’s particular POL experiences an outage, then the route to those providers is also cut off and the company and customer both lose out.

Is it worth transitioning to a POL?

Looking forward, it’s likely the technology won’t stop evolving –-especially considering that 72 per cent of SMEs are using web-based payment platforms and that e-commerce sales are forecast to grow by 56 per cent by 2026.

Ultimately, payabl.’s investigation has uncovered some key points of discussion when considering implementing a payment orchestration layer. In an ideal world accessing technology that can make managing multiple payment providers easier is desirable, however, merchants should carefully weigh the true benefits and potential drawbacks of adopting such technology in order to manage their payments’ function and consult with a payment provider to explore all potential options.


  • Francis is a journalist and our lead LatAm correspondent, with a BA in Classical Civilization, he has a specialist interest in North and South America.

Related posts

CFTC Cracks Down on DeFi Firms in the US but Course of Action Causes Concern

Tom Bleach

Funding Options Launches New Data Platform, Funding Cloud: Insights

Nathan Gore

Founder and CEO of yulife Talks Gamification, Living Well and Doing Well

Manisha Patel