Climate Change ESG (Image Source:
Banks Europe Fintech Insights Regtech Trending

Financial Institutions Must Act Now if They Are To Meet Looming Climate Risk Deadlines

A barometer has been published by Acin that charts the preparedness of the world’s leading banks and asset managers in meeting the upcoming challenges associated with climate change-related risks.

With regulatory clocks ticking for these organisations to embed climate risk into their financial risk management frameworks by January 2022, the vast majority of firms have acknowledged the need to act on climate risk and have made progress.

However, independent research commissioned by Acin, produced from an analysis of their annual and, where available, sustainability and climate reports, reveals that much remains to be done in terms of practical implementation.

Encouraging Signs

Analysis of financial institutions displayed a clear and collective acknowledgment of the need to meet and address the risks posed by climate change. Two-thirds (67%) of firms reference a corporate net-zero target between 2025 and 2050 in their reports. 14% of these organisations have gone further by setting a commitment to reach their net-zero targets by 2035, some 15 years in advance of the global deadline set by the Paris Agreement.

In a further encouraging sign of progress, 70% of banks and asset managers reference alignment with the Task Force for Climate-Related Disclosures (TCFD) and its principles. Only 8% of the organisations make no reference at all to how they themselves were aligning or were planning to align with TCFD.

Many of the financial institutions analysed are currently capturing, publishing, and acting on climate-related data, as well as preparing for future impact of risks. 81% of these organisations publish detailed data on the impact of their own operations (business premises, air travel, etc.). And 60% of firms already conduct some form of planning to prepare for the impacts of chronic climate risk; many are undertaking scenario analysis and specific risk assessment exercises for areas most likely to be affected by climate risks.

Many organisations are also appointing or implementing new structures to enhance efforts to address climate change-related risk. 40% of firms reference a dedicated individual, team, or task force to focus on climate change-related risk in their latest reports, citing the ways in which these teams or task forces are embedded within internal structures.

The Big Next Step

However, what is clear from the research is that there is still a long way to go. In general, firms are publishing limited data on the impact of their activities beyond the carbon footprint of their own operations. This suggests that although they are preparing for the impact of climate-related risks, they are not able to measure progress adequately at this stage or are unwilling to make numbers publicly known.

For instance, data reporting around climate risk is still immature, with less than one-fifth (19%) of firms including detailed information within their reports. Less than one fifth (14%) of the organiSations publish extensive (3 years) current and historic data on client (or investee) emissions in their reports. Only 40% of organisations are currently publishing some data and/or reference plans to begin publishing data on client (or investee) emissions in the future. However, nearly half (46%) make no mention of client (or investee) emissions data, suggesting that much more needs to be done before organisations can begin to meet their objectives and regulatory obligations to manage climate risk.

This is also reflected in the extent to which climate risk is embedded in risk management processes. Most firms make some reference to embedding climate risk within their risk management process. However, when it comes to implementation, progress is varied, with only 37% of firms referencing a mature approach to climate risk management, and nearly half (48%) intending to develop their framework in the future.

There are a number of ways these firms are approaching their risk management frameworks. The preferred approach is to integrate climate risk into existing risk management frameworks, with a number of organisations stating they have strengthened or will strengthen their framework with new guidelines and processes for managing climate risk. In addition to this approach, a few make specific references to climate or environmental risk management frameworks that they are drawing from, such as the Equator Principles. However, a small number (12%) are taking a different tack by establishing or intending to establish a separate climate risk management framework.

Paul Ford, CEO and Founder of Acin
Paul Ford, CEO and Founder, Acin

“It’s encouraging to see evidence of banks and asset managers responding to climate change,” comments Paul Ford, the CEO of Acin. “That said, the research clearly indicates some tough work ahead. Commitments are an essential first step, but we know from experience that embedding risks and controls in an organization is challenging.

“Climate risk is an emerging discipline where roles and responsibilities may not yet be fully defined, and the nature of the risks transcend financial and non-financial. Staying on top of what is clearly emerging regulation is not easy either. UK and European regulators expect to see climate risk embedded in 2022, if firms are to avoid capital adequacy implications. Acin’s peer network and platform, along with our initial inventory of climate risks and controls driven by the latest regulatory guidance, are helping firms meet these challenges.”


  • Tyler is a fintech journalist with specific interests in online banking and emerging AI technologies. He began his career writing with a plethora of national and international publications.

Related posts

OKX to Debut as McLaren Racing’s Primary Partner During Miami Grand Prix

Tyler Pathe

Network International Launches Ghana Centre

Tom Bleach

HPD Lendscape Join The Spanish Association of Factoring Increasing Funding To the Region’s SMEs

Francis Bignell